{
  "format": "carrier-choice-charter/1",
  "version": 1,
  "creator": "A",
  "source_sha256": "aefa3569d54ddadcc7ecf01890416abf14dd1b99d21325219e36bb802f2c5df7",
  "constraints": [
    {
      "id": "A3-C1",
      "reason": "Care that continues through a bounded refusal is the protected central reference.",
      "kind": "cell",
      "cell": "n01",
      "properties": {
        "c": "#056F41"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "A3-C2",
      "reason": "The aperture on the approach remains deliberately unselected and cannot become a selected consent concept.",
      "kind": "cell",
      "cell": "n10",
      "properties": {
        "c": null
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "A3-C3",
      "reason": "The consent reference stays distinguishable from capability, invitation, and continued help.",
      "kind": "cell",
      "cell": "n02",
      "properties": {
        "c": "#057971"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "A3-C4",
      "reason": "Consent remains a proposed limit on care's application in the visible relation structure.",
      "kind": "link",
      "f": "n02",
      "t": "n01",
      "r": 2,
      "present": true
    },
    {
      "id": "A3-C5",
      "reason": "The arrival retains an explicit possible approach toward continued care.",
      "kind": "link",
      "f": "n04",
      "t": "n01",
      "r": 3,
      "present": true
    },
    {
      "id": "A3-C6",
      "reason": "The arrival and care remain distinctly placed but within the scale of an approachable crossing.",
      "kind": "separation",
      "a": "n04",
      "b": "n01",
      "min": 190,
      "max": 390
    }
  ]
}
