{
  "format": "usl-open-expression-amendment/1",
  "decision": "replace",
  "targetExpressionSHA256": "d049faca9c953d4b742538937d49ec666befffda89059719fbbad494bd86798d",
  "interpretationSHA256": "b21ffd9798266319e496b90c54082577143cf3d43c04854f5bd6cf11648cfbb6",
  "targetClauseID": "p05",
  "originalClauseSHA256": "2bf1ff35f032b57cd83d8e3520291070b6de981365fa1ecc15d0691b798ec203",
  "replacement": {
    "id": "p05",
    "act": "propose",
    "scope": "ukraine",
    "subject": "the separately authorized administrators of a proposed conditional benefit",
    "concepts": [
      {
        "role": "decision discipline",
        "ref": "C8"
      },
      {
        "role": "method for correcting a commitment",
        "ref": "C6"
      }
    ],
    "terms": {
      "action": "Withhold only the disputed additional non-humanitarian benefit when the pre-agreed independent verification procedure finds the milestone unsatisfied or finds that a dispute meets its pre-agreed evidentiary threshold; give a reasoned decision, review it within the interval fixed before the milestone, and restore the benefit unless that same procedure finds that the threshold for continued withholding remains satisfied.",
      "boundary": "Keep the protected baseline in p03 and its essential dependencies outside this hold; the hold supplies no decision about the Gaza context."
    },
    "when": {
      "event": "The pre-agreed independent verification procedure finds that the agreed milestone for releasing a proposed additional non-humanitarian benefit is unsatisfied, or that a dispute about satisfaction meets the procedure's pre-agreed evidentiary threshold",
      "scope": "ukraine"
    },
    "qualifications": [
      "No administrator, milestone, benefit, verification procedure, threshold or review interval is asserted to exist. Their authority and terms must come from a separately authorized arrangement rather than from this clause.",
      "An allegation alone does not satisfy the trigger. Continued withholding requires the same pre-agreed procedure to find at each required review that the threshold remains satisfied; otherwise the disputed benefit is restored.",
      "This replacement changes only p05 and does not alter p03, p04, p06 or any other clause."
    ]
  },
  "reason": "The original p05 correctly flags that 'credibly disputed' needs an agreed evidentiary test, but it leaves the trigger and duration of withholding too open. This replacement makes the proposed hold depend on a pre-agreed independent procedure, a pre-agreed threshold, a review interval fixed in advance, and restoration unless continued withholding remains justified under the same procedure, while preserving the protected humanitarian floor and the separation from Gaza."
  ,"preserveOtherClauses": true
}