Mutual aid traditionally refers to an organizational model where community members partake in voluntary, collaborative exchanges of resources and services to overcome social, economic, and political barriers and meet common needs while mobilizing to fight injustice.[1] Mutual aid can include physical resources like food, clothing, or medicine, as well as services like breakfast programs or education. These groups are often built for the daily needs of their communities, but mutual aid groups are also found throughout relief efforts, such as in natural disasters or pandemics like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Definition
Dean Spade identifies three key elements of mutual aid: (1) addressing material needs while analyzing why these needs aren't already met; (2) building solidarity and strengthening social movements; (3) participatory.[2] In contract to charity, which often requires benefit recipients to meet certain conditions (e.g., means testing, grant stipulations), mutual aid does not discriminate between those "deserving" and "undeserving" of care. These groups often go beyond material or service exchange and are set up as a form of political participation in which people take responsibility for caring for one another and changing political conditions.
Mutual aid groups are distinct in their drive to flatten hierarchy, searching for collective consensus decision-making across participating people rather than placing leadership within a closed executive team. With this joint decision-making, all participating members are empowered to enact change and take responsibility for the group.
History
The term "mutual aid" was popularized by the anarchist philosopher Peter Kropotkin in his essay collection Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, originally published in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[3] Kropotkin argued that cooperation, not competition, was the driving mechanism behind evolution, through biological mutualism.[4] Kropotkin argued that mutual aid has pragmatic advantages for the survival of humans and animals and has been promoted through natural selection, and that mutual aid is arguably as ancient as human culture.[4] This recognition of the widespread character and individual benefit of mutual aid stood in contrast to the theories of social Darwinism that emphasized individual competition and survival of the fittest.
Practice
Mutual aid participants work together to figure out strategies and resources to meet each other's needs, such as food, housing, medical care, and disaster relief while organizing themselves against the system that created the shortage in the first place.[5]
Some challenges to the success of mutual aid groups include lack of technical experts, lack of funding, lack of public legitimacy,[7] and institutionalization of social hierarchies.[8]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, mutual aid and grassroots solidarity groups around the world organized distribution networks for food and personal protective equipment.[19] The term "mutual aid", previously associated with anarchism, drifted into public parlance during the pandemic. Local mutual aid groups, sometimes as local as the street level, organized to help shop, deliver medicine, create games for kids,[18] offering civic connection during a time of isolation. Multiple online outlets ran stories on how to create a mutual aid group.[20]
Around the same time was the Black Lives Matter movement, which resulted in multiple protestors detained and arrested by police.[21] Bail funds, which are community organizations that pays cash bail for people in need for free, is another example of a mutual aid organization.[22]
^Bacharach, Samuel B.; Bamberger, Peter; Sonnenstuhl, William J. (2001). Mutual aid and union renewal: cycles of logics of action. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. p. 173. ISBN0-8014-8734-X.
^Kropotkin, Peter (2008). Mutual aid: a factor of evolution. [Charleston, SC]: Forgotten Books. p. 117. ISBN978-1-60680-071-3.
^Beito, David T. (2000). From mutual aid to the welfare state: fraternal societies and social services, 1890–1967. Chapel Hill [u.a.]: Univ. of North Carolina Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN0-8078-4841-7.
^Shapely, Peter (2007). Borsay, Anne (ed.). Medicine, charity and mutual aid: the consumption of health and welfare in Britain, c. 1550–1950; [5th international conference of the European Association of Urban Historians, which was held in Berlin in summer 2000] ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Aldershot [u.a.]: Ashgate. pp. 7–8. ISBN978-0-7546-5148-2.
Midgley, James; Hosaka, Mitsuhiko, eds. (2011). Grassroots Social Security in Asia: Mutual Aid, Microinsurance and Social Welfare. Routledge. ISBN978-0-203-83178-6. LCCN2010031554.
Moyse Steinberg, Dominique (2009) [2004]. The Mutual-aid Approach to Working with Groups: Helping People Help One Another (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN978-0-7890-1462-7. LCCN2004007025.
Preston, John; Firth, Rhiannon (2020). Coronavirus, Class and Mutual Aid in the United Kingdom. Springer. ISBN9783030577131.
Servigne, Pablo; Chapelle, Gauthier (2022). Mutual Aid: The Other Law of the Jungle. Wiley. ISBN978-1509547920.