Unified State Advisory Memorandum No. 3

Humanitarian Nuclear‑Risk Readiness (Movement Appeal)

Kyiv  |  17 July 2025 – 4:04 EEST (UTC +3)


Protocol Note

This is the third communication in our escalation‑risk sequence. Please kindly reference Advisory Memorandum No. 1 (Endorsement of U.S. Defensive Support & Nuclear‑Risk Warning) and Advisory Memorandum No. 2 (Global Unity & Liaison Invitation) when logging receipt in Movement records.

Memo 01: https://www.unifiedstate.us/unified-state-advisory-memorandum-01/
Memo 02: https://www.unifiedstate.us/unified-state-advisory-memorandum-02/

This appeal is addressed to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and shared simultaneously with governments (via their embassies in Kyiv, Ankara, Berlin) solely to facilitate support to their own National Societies; it does not seek to alter Movement governance or decision‑making.


Purpose

We request Movement‑wide coordination for potential nuclear or large‑scale radiological escalation scenarios that could impact densely populated urban areas in Eastern Europe and beyond, and we reaffirm the Unified State’s full respect for the Fundamental Principles—Humanity, Impartiality, Neutrality, Independence, Voluntary Service, Unity, Universality.

Our intent is to support, not burden, the Red Cross / Red Crescent (RC/RC) Movement: offering data, liaison, and public messaging channels to help you do what only you can credibly do—protect civilians and uphold the nuclear taboo as a civilisational red line.


Historical Grounding: Why the Movement Matters Now

ICRC medical delegates who witnessed the aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki helped awaken the world to the unmanageable humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons—a warning the Movement has repeated for decades. It was renewed in the ICRC’s 2010–2011 appeal; formalised in the 2011 Council of Delegates Resolution 1: “Working towards the elimination of nuclear weapons”; amplified through the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons Conferences (Oslo 2013; Nayarit 2014; Vienna 2014); and continues in Movement engagement around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

The core message endures: no national or international response capacity can adequately assist the victims of even a single nuclear detonation in a populated area, let alone multiple strikes. Capacity gaps documented by the ICRC remain stark despite technological advances.


Escalation Context

  • Renewed nuclear rhetoric linked to recent long‑range weapons transfers and tariff‑based pressure measures.
  • Public narratives invoking a “nuclear ultimatum” are spreading across media ecosystems, heightening anxiety and misinformation.
  • Trusted, neutral guidance from the RC/RC Movement can reduce panic and save lives when fear spikes.

Unified State Commitments to the Movement

  1. Neutrality & Independence Respected: We recognise and uphold the auxiliary but independent status of National Societies vis‑à‑vis their public authorities, as established in international humanitarian law and Movement Statutes. If any Unified State wording or imagery risks politicising Movement emblems, please flag and we will correct immediately.
  2. Data Protection: All information shared with the Working Cell will travel over encrypted channels; nothing public without Movement clearance. IFRC Nuclear & Radiological Emergency Guidelines stress clear data‑sharing arrangements with authorities and partners.
  3. Support, Not Direction: Unified State offers analytical lift—GIS, modelling, translation, sentiment monitoring—strictly under Movement guidance; aligned with IFRC technological‑hazard preparedness doctrine.

Request: Establish a Kyiv–Geneva RC/RC Nuclear‑Risk Working Cell

We invite ICRC, IFRC, and interested National Societies to nominate focal points for a rapid coordination cell. Proposed workstreams:

A. Situational Mapping & Data Exchange

  • Population density overlays (priority urban centres).
  • Locations & surge capacities of hospitals, burn units, blood banks (releasable tiers).
  • Public shelter inventories (metro, basements, hardened sites) & suitability tags.
  • Radiation/fallout plume modelling hooks (IAEA / national met inputs).

B. Medical Surge & Supply Readiness

  • Burn‑care triage & scarce‑resource protocols.
  • Potassium iodide distribution matrices (age/risk‑appropriate).
  • Decontamination & CBRN PPE kit caches; dosimetry badge logistics.
  • Cross‑border blood supply continuity.
  • MHPSS / PFA surge rosters for radiation‑anxiety & mass‑casualty stress.

C. Public Risk Communication Templates

  • Shelter‑vs‑evacuate decision trees (icon‑driven).
  • Rapid decontamination steps (remove outer clothing, wash, bag).
  • Guidance tailored for children, elders, persons with disabilities.
  • Multilingual SMS / radio scripts; rumour‑control tiles (see FEMA nuclear comms).

D. Protection, Gender & Inclusion (PGI)

  • Safe evacuation & registration for unaccompanied minors / separated families.
  • GBV risk mitigation in shelters; safe‑space partition guidance.
  • Accessible signage & plain‑language variants.

E. Interoperability & Liaison

  • Secure comms bridge (Signal / Matrix; HF fallback) linking Kyiv field & Geneva HQ.
  • Common data schema (CSV + GIS shapefiles) for emergency uploads.
  • Read‑only linkage to WHO REMPAN & IAEA Incident & Emergency Centre alert streams.

Immediate Actions Requested

  1. Primary Point of Contact (name, role, secure e‑mail / Signal).
  2. Snapshot of National Nuclear / Radiological Contingency Assets (public vs restricted tiers).
  3. Interest in a Technical Consultation Call (propose windows; session when quorum reached).
  4. Permissions / Red Lines re public mention of your Society’s involvement.

Secure Channels

Encrypted e‑mail (PGP of GPG) — fingerprint on request.
Signal (preferred for urgent coordination) — on request.
Secure upload vault (SSH / SFTP) — credentials issued individually after POC confirmation.


Alignment with Multiversal Books

For archival transparency across states and timelines, a cryptographic hash of this memorandum and Movement responses will be entered in the Multiversal Books Ledger of the Unified State — a fundamental physical register honouring our shared humanitarian duty beyond politics, borders, and eras.


Closing

The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement has carried hope into humanity’s worst hours. Should a nuclear shadow lengthen, the world will look to you again. We come not to add weight, but to help you lift it.

Our axis of goodwill, love, and freedom holds; together we can keep it stable.

— Lucid Founder • Michael Tulsky
on behalf of the Unified State
Kyiv  |  17 July 2025 – 4:04 EEST (UTC +3)


References

  1. IFRC. “The Auxiliary Role of National Societies.” Accessed 2025.
  2. ICRC. “Humanitarian impacts and risks of use of nuclear weapons”  |  Joint ICRC/IFRC Statement on humanitarian capacity limits (5 Mar 2025).
  3. ICRC. Legal & Policy Position on Nuclear Weapons (includes 2010 appeal context).
  4. Council of Delegates of the Movement. Resolution 1: Working towards the elimination of nuclear weapons (2011) – official text  |  Report of the 31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.
  5. ICRC / IFRC. Humanitarian response capacity gaps after nuclear use (2025 statement).
  6. Financial Times. Reporting on tariff‑based pressure measures linked to the war in Ukraine (2025).  |  Reuters. Nuclear‑safety incident involving IAEA experts (Dec 2024).
  7. UNITED24 Media. Simonyan warns of a “nuclear ultimatum” amid long‑range missile debate (Jul 2025).  |  Institute of Mass Information (IMI). Simonyan “nuclear ultimatum” post (Oct 2023).
  8. ICRC. Red Cross Field Hospital in Gaza overwhelmed by mass‑casualty incidents (Jul 2025).
  9. IFRC. Mental Health & Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) in emergencies.
  10. ICRC. The Fundamental Principles of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement.
  11. IFRC. Nuclear & Radiological Emergency Guidelines (2015; ongoing relevance).  |  Direct PDF.
  12. Technological and Biological Hazard Preparedness Roadmap
  13. WHO. Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness & Assistance Network (REMPAN).
  14. IAEA. Incident & Emergency Centre (global EPR focal point).
  15. CDC. Potassium Iodide (KI) guidance for radiation emergencies.
  16. American Red Cross. Emergency preparedness hub (includes radiological guidance).  |  FEMA. 72‑Hour Nuclear Detonation Response & Communications Guidance.
  17. WHO. Disability & Health (inclusive considerations for emergencies).
  18. IFRC / Movement. Civil‑Military Relations in Armed Conflict: Guidance for the Movement.

Comments

One response to “Unified State Advisory Memorandum No. 3”

  1. […] Please read alongside Unified State Advisory Memorandum No. 3 – Humanitarian Nuclear‑Risk Readiness (Movement Appeal). […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *