Chromatic Choices

Unified State / Findings / Chromatic Choices

Room for more than one reply.

A reply can obey every explicit condition and still be unwanted. A viewer can value a reply the creator would decline. An expressive instrument needs room for both facts.

First reply	Passes charter	Creator permits	Interpreter I1 accepts	Interpreter I2 accepts
Copy	6/6	6/6	6/6	6/6
Frozen Inheritance	2/6	0/6	3/6	3/6
Inheritance + explicit protection	6/6	1/6	3/6	3/6
AI responder R1	6/6	6/6	6/6	6/6
AI responder R2	6/6	6/6	6/6	6/6

Out of six works: copy passes six charters and is permitted six times; raw Inheritance passes two and is permitted zero; protected Inheritance passes six and is permitted once; each AI responder passes and is permitted six times. — These are different criteria on six purposefully composed works, with unequal inputs across methods. No causal or population comparison is established.

Seven permissible replies were unwanted

Seven first replies meet every explicit condition yet their creators decline them. Both interpreters agree with one another on binary acceptance, but each accepts five replies the creators decline. Interpretation remains free; that approval does not authorize rewriting another participant’s field.

Every work admits alternatives

For each source, both separately composed AI replies are structurally changed, charter-compliant and accepted by its creator. A2 also admits the protected numerical update. Unchanged copies are accepted for all six works. More than one continuation can be permissible without being interchangeable.

Feedback can end in a pause

In two three-cycle reciprocal encounters, a targeted second reply answers creator feedback. Each creator then permits stillness; both responders preserve the composition for their final proposal and obtain explicit acceptance. All six proposals are adopted. No refusal or charter amendment occurs in these dialogues.

Protection still needs interpretation

The protected numerical program enforces 31 creator conditions across six works. Its paths pass 72/72 steps using 66 property restorations and two vetoes; the raw program passes 21/72. These are operational guarantees on the tested sources, not evidence of learned consent. The numerical program never receives the prose intentions that the AI responders can read.

Raw program charter compliance across six twelve-step paths — Twelve numerical steps per work; original charters remain fixed.

What this supports

Keep an expressive field, its declared conditions, a proposed interpretation and the decision to adopt separately inspectable. Let several replies remain possible. Make a refusal effective. Let doing nothing remain an available answer.

These are six purposefully composed works from two AI creator sessions, twelve replies from two further AI sessions, and judgments from the creators and two fresh interpreters. The sessions share a model family and prior language training; exact backend builds are not independently authenticated. This is neither a population estimate nor a study of human experience, consciousness, or a Carrier advantage over another notation.

Costs and long-horizon practical benefits remain unmeasured. There is no prose or JSON control in this study and no claim of notation superiority.

Research record: complete downloadable record · method and full findings · interactive works. The record preserves sources, first replies, judgments, constraints, raw proposals, checks, code and prospective changes.